Search Results for "penalty assessment"

557 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 557 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by State Power Entities Against APTEL Order Deleting Misdeclaration Penalty. Penalty for Misdeclaration of Declared Capacity Requires Proof of Intent or Negligence Under Punjab State Grid Code Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Punjab State Load Despatch Centre (PSLDC) and Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) against the judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Damages Against Employer in EPF Act Case for Default in Contributions. Levy of Damages Under Section 14B is Consequential Upon Default Without Requirement of Mens Rea for Breach of Civil Obligations.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka, which upheld an order for recovery of damages under Section 14B of the Employees Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order in Tax Assessment Writ Petition Due to Statutory Remedy Foreclosure. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Writ Petition After Statutory Appeal Was Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

The dispute arose from a tax assessment order dated 21.6.2017 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the respondent, a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be imposed for mere disallowance of claim without finding of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 29.12.2016, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Set Aside as Surrender of Income Was to Buy Peace, Not Concealment. Stock Difference Detected During Survey Was Not Deliberately Concealed and Related to Earlier Assessment Year.

The appellant-assessee, a partnership firm running a bar and restaurant, was subjected to a survey under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Alliance Space Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in property development, challenged two notices dated 24th March 2015 and 29th March ...