Search Results for "penal rent"

540 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 540 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Criminal Quashing Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Criminal Proceedings Under Section 482 CrPC Without Considering Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Forgery and Cheating in Sale Deed Execution Require Trial, Not Quashing at Threshold.

The appellant-complainant lodged a private complaint against the private respondents alleging offences under Sections 120B, 201, 419, 471, 468 and 420...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Bonafide Requirement of Landlord Upheld. Tenant's Claim of Availability of Alternate Premises Rejected as Landlord Cannot Be Compelled to Use Residential Premises for Commercial Purpose Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the defendant-tenant (Parshuram Chunilal Kanojiya) challenging the eviction decree passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case — Rent Dispute Not Caste-Based. Allegations of Abusive Language Without Caste Reference Do Not Attract Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 2015.

The petitioners, owners of a flat in Bangalore, entered into a rental agreement with the second respondent-complainant on 21.06.2018. A dispute arose ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Fixes Interim Compensation for Tenant Pending Eviction Revision — Mesne Profits Determined Based on Valuer Reports and Rental Market. Tenant Ordered to Pay Rs.25,000 Per Month as Interim Compensation Under Section 12 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant, Previn Govind Sharma, against an eviction decree passed by the Appellate Bench of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by MSRTC Challenging Industrial Court Order Setting Aside Rent Recovery. Corporation Failed to Follow Proper Procedure Before Recovering Non-Concessional Rent from Employee Who Continued to Occupy Quarter After Transfer.

The petitioner, Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 06.01.200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Property Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Allegations of Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Not Made Out as Dispute Pertained to Non-Payment of Rent Under Leave and License Agreement.

The applicants, Dr. Arun Kumar Barthakur and Basant Kumar Jain, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Forum for Trial in SEBI Act Cases — Retrospective Application of 2002 and 2014 Amendments Disputed. Court Considers Whether Change from Magistrate to Sessions Court and Subsequent Special Courts Affects Pre‑2002 Offences Still Pending.

This batch of appeals and petitions before the Supreme Court concerned the proper forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange Board ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...