Search Results for "pecuniary advantage"

208 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Insurance Company, Holds Mediclaim Amount Not Deductible from Motor Accident Compensation. Contractual Insurance Benefit Is Independent of Statutory Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and Cannot Be Deducted to Avoid Double Recovery.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the question whether amounts received by a claimant under a Mediclaim policy are deductible from the compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Ex Gratia Payment Not Deductible. High Court's award of Rs. 48,00,000 with 7.5% interest held just; no interference required.

The case arises from a vehicular accident on 30.12.1995 where Shri Rajpal Singh Johal died after an oil tanker rammed into his car. Two claim petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. Compensation for playground land enhanced from Rs.30 to Rs.102 per sqm based on comparable sales and location advantages under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Village Panchayat of Collem, challenged the judgment and award dated 13.01.2010 passed by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Eknath s/o Laxman Gaikwad, was a Lineman (Assistant Lineman) employed at the Fuse Call Centre of Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...