Search Results for "parliamentary secretary"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Co-operative Election Dispute — Upholds Single Judge Order Rejecting Challenge to Election Notification. Court holds that challenge to election process after issuance of notification is not maintainable under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by three appellants, who were the President and Directors of the Tumkur Co-operative Milk Producers Societies Un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Constitutionality of Section 394(1) CrPC for Lack of Distinction Between Pre- and Post-Death Acquittal in NI Act Cases. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional and the petition lacked merit.

The petitioner, G Varadaraju, an 89-year-old individual appearing in person, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 64 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Barring Legal Practitioners from Appearing Before College Tribunal. Section 64 is Not Repugnant to Advocates Act, 1961 as Section 30 Thereof is Not in Force and Tribunal is Not a Court.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging Section 64 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, which bars legal practitioners from appeari...