Search Results for "owner impleadment"

341 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 341 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Against Order Rejecting Impleadment in Suit for Specific Performance. Appellants Sought to Be Added as Co-Plaintiffs, Citing Interest in Property and Necessity for Complete Adjudication.

This appeal arose from the order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court rejecting Chamber Summons No.1334/2004, by which the appellants so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Impleadment and Amendment in Specific Performance Suit — Trial Court Order Rejected. Proposed Parties in Possession Are Proper Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, Their Impleadment Necessary to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No. 48 of 2010 pending before the 4th Senior Civil Court, Porbandar, filed a writ petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioners Not Necessary or Proper Parties Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. Leasehold Rights Acquired Pending Suit Are Subject to Lis Pendens and Do Not Entitle Impleadment.

The petitioners, Sandeep Ramesh Solanki and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petitions Challenging Orders on Impleading and Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Held That Trial Court's Discretionary Orders Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Are Not Interfered With Under Article 227.

The case involves two Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, arising from a suit for specific performanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Co-Legal Heirs as Co-Plaintiffs in Eviction Suit. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Allows Necessary Parties to Join to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings, Even in Presence of Conflict of Interest.

The case arises from an eviction suit filed by Maude D'Penha (the original landlady) through her son and General Power of Attorney, Loy Kenneth D'penh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Impleadment of Proposed Defendants in Suit Under MOFA. Court holds that impleadment of persons claiming title to the property is necessary for effective adjudication of the suit under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Mahendra Jayantilal Vora and two others (petitioners) challenging an order of the trial court allowing thei...