Search Results for "owner's ignorance"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Breach of Policy Conditions Not Proved by Insurance Company. Claimants entitled to compensation as insurer failed to establish that vehicle was used for commercial purpose in violation of policy terms.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Rambhau Gawai and his two sons (appellants) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside Due to Perverse Findings on Adverse Possession. Burden of Proof for Adverse Possession Lies on Claimant; Mere Long Possession Insufficient Under Section 100 CPC.

The present appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a judgment and decree dated 2.6.2007 passed by the Civil Judge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Purushotham and Manjunatha (appellants) against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2005 passed by the First Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.

The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...