Search Results for "option cargo"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "option cargo"

90 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Travel Agencies in Service Tax Export Case — Services Rendered to Foreign Clients Abroad Constitute Export of Service Under Finance Act, 1994. Extended Period of Limitation Under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994 Cannot Be Invoked Without Suppression or Fraud.

19 Jan 2026

The Madras High Court allowed two appeals filed by M/s. Translanka Air Travels Pvt Ltd and M/s. ETA Travel Agency Pvt Ltd against orders of the Custom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Company Seeking Mandamus to Permit Construction of Captive Jetty and Cement Plant in Mangrove Area. Court holds that prior environmental clearances are mandatory and the petitioner cannot circumvent the directions in PIL No.87/2006.

5 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Adani Cementation Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and part of the Adani Group, filed a writ petition see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Conditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit. Condition of Deposit of Rs. 18 Lakhs Upheld as Not Perverse or Arbitrary Under Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

15 Mar 2024

The Petitioner (Defendant in the suit) filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.07.2023 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case on Redemption Fine and Penalty for Excess Goods Cleared Under Bond. The Court held that once confiscation of goods under Sections 111(l), (m) and (o) of the Customs Act, 1962 is upheld, imposition of redemption fine under Section 125 and penalty under Section 112(a) is mandatory and not discretionary.

18 Jul 2023

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Import) against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

4 Dec 2019

The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Mortgagee Bank to Fund Essential Supplies to Arrested Vessel Pending Judicial Sale — Priority of Supply Claims as Sheriff's Expenses. The court held that the mortgagee bank must bear the cost of preserving the arrested vessel and such expenses rank first in priority over all other claims.

11 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Coromandel International Limited, filed an Admiralty Suit against the vessel m.v. GLORY I and its owners, Andromeda Ship Holdings Ltd.,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Act Case — Confiscation and Penalties Quashed for Lack of Mens Rea. Imported capital goods released on payment of duty; no deliberate intent to evade duty established under Sections 111(d), 111(f), 112(a), and 125 of Customs Act, 1962.

27 Jan 2014

The petitioners, M/s. Central Cables Limited (a company manufacturing electric wires and cables), its Managing Director Govind Daga, and Purchase Offi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Customs Duty Exemption Case for Hospital Equipment. Condition of Free Treatment Under Notification No.64/1988-Cus. Must Be Strictly Complied With for Exemption.

8 Jan 2010

The applicant, M/s National Heart Centre & Hypertension Clinic, through its Director Dr. Shashank Bhalchandra Subhedar, imported a Computerized Stress...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Recovery Case — Customs Authorities Cannot Recover Duty Dehors Sections 28 and 125 of Customs Act, 1962. Duty on Confiscated Goods Not Recoverable When Redemption Option Not Exercised.

15 Jun 2006

The Bombay High Court, in an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, considered two substantial questions of law: whether customs authoriti...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)