Search Results for "office copy admissibility"

296 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 296 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Hears Criminal Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case. Trial Court Found Cheque Dishonoured but Dismissed Complaint for Lack of Authorization of Power of Attorney Holder Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The present criminal appeal arose from the acquittal of the respondent-accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direction for Voice Sample Collection in Bribery Investigation — Rejects Article 20(3) Challenge. Court holds that giving voice sample does not amount to testimonial compulsion and is permissible during investigation under Section 311A CrPC.

The petitioner, Madhukar K. Farde, an Assistant PF Commissioner and Recovery Officer, was accused by the CBI of demanding a bribe of Rs.1,00,000 from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Will Validity and Adverse Possession. The court upheld the validity of a Will and rejected the claim of adverse possession by co-owners, holding that possession must be hostile and with ouster to ripen into title.

The dispute pertains to a property known as 'Sullachi Nhat' in Calangute, Goa. The plaintiffs claimed title through a Will executed by Joao Francisco ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition, Holds Accused Cannot Cross-Examine Approver at Pre-Committal Stage Under Section 306(4) CrPC. The right to cross-examine the approver arises only after committal to the Court of Sessions, as the examination under Section 306(4) is for committal purposes only.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, which allowed the respondents (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Will Validity and Adverse Possession. The court held that the Will was not proved but the defendants failed to prove adverse possession, remanding for fresh consideration.

The dispute concerns a property at Calangute known as 'Sullachi Nhat' with a house, originally owned by Joao Francisco Lobo and his wife Joanita Lobo....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Kumar Jasraj Burad. The court found that the marks 'MERELANE' and 'MARICELL' are deceptively similar and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'MARICELL'.

The appellant, Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for infringement of its registered trademark 'MERELANE' and for passing off against the res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disagrees with Rajni Tandon on Interpretation of 'Person Executing' under Section 32(a) of Registration Act, 1908. Power-of-Attorney Holder Not Executant; Authentication under Section 33 Required for Agent Presenting under Section 32(c).

The present appeals before the Supreme Court of India arose from a civil suit concerning the validity of an Irrevocable General Power of Attorney date...