Search Results for "obstruction removal"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Decree-Holders' Appeals Against Executing Court's Interim Stay Order in Execution Proceedings. Held That Executing Court Cannot Stay Execution Beyond Order XXI Rule 29 CPC and Must Follow Procedure Under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC Before Arrest.

The case involves appeals by the decree-holders (appellants) against an interim order dated 29th June 2018 passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Kottayam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice in Hoarding Removal Case Due to Premeditated Decision — Show-Cause Notice Issued by Deputy Municipal Commissioner Conveyed Final Decision Without Leaving Scope for Genuine Response, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, M/s Sine Fine Advertising Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged a show-cause notice dated 11/01/2023 issued by the Deputy Municipal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Over Collector’s Authority to Impose Conditions on Transmission Line Project Under Indian Telegraph Act

The dispute arose from the construction of a 400 KV DC transmission line between Aurangabad and Boisar by Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., a Gove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Possession and Removal of Obstruction. Earlier Suit Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit Does Not Bar Subsequent Suit if Cause of Action is Different.

The revision application was filed by the original defendant No.1 against the order of the Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gangapur, dismissing his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Order Under Section 133 Cr.P.C. for Removal of Obstruction to Public Pathway. Court upholds concurrent findings that the disputed pathway is a public road and petitioners failed to prove exclusive ownership.

The case arises from a petition under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the first respondent (Balachanda M. Thammaiah) agai...