Search Results for "mutual mistake"

194 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 194 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash Compromise Decree in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Held That Compromise Decree Was Not Validly Passed as It Was Based on a Consent Term That Was Contrary to Law and Without Jurisdiction.

The case involves a dispute over property ownership. The original petitioner, Narhar Rango Kulkarni (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Family Business Dispute. Dispute Centers on Inclusion of Agricultural Lands Held by Individual Family Members in Family Asset Separation Process.

The appeal arose from a family dispute within the Malhotra family of Pune, who owned and controlled several businesses including Weikfield Products Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Mutation Entry Orders in Land Dispute — Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Mutation entries made without notice to petitioners set aside under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioners, Damodar Vittal Kamath and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Initiates Suo Moto Contempt for Scandalous Allegations Against High Court Judge. Unconditional Apology Accepted, Contempt Proceedings Closed.

The Supreme Court initiated suo moto contempt proceedings against N. Peddi Raju (alleged contemnor no.1), Ritesh Patil (alleged contemnor no.2), and N...