Search Results for "misconception"

518 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Challenging Conviction for Rape of Cousin Sister Resulting in Pregnancy. DNA Report Established Accused and Victim as Biological Parents of Child Born Under Sections 376, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) Indian Penal Code.

The appeal arises from a judgment of conviction rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Case No. 55 of 2020 dated 20.8.2022. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rape Case - Discharge Order Restored as Consent Was Not Based on Misconception of Fact - Relationship Between Married Parties Was Consensual

<p>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Appellant against the High Court's order which had set aside his discharge in a rape case -...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Former Judicial Officer in Sexual Offence Case, Upholding Charges Under Sections 376(2)(f), 417, and 506 IPC Based on Prima Facie Evidence of False Promise to Marriage and Exploitation

<p>The Appellant, a former judicial officer, sought discharge from charges under Sections 376(2)(f), 417, and 506 IPC, alleging a consensual rel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Quash Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage. Allegations of Sexual Assault Over 15 Years Under Threat of Viral Video and Extortion Not Fit for Quashing at Initial Stage.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the High Court's refusal to quash criminal proceedings for rape and other offences. The appellant was ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Where Relationship Was Consensual and No False Promise of Marriage — Ingredients of Section 375 IPC Not Made Out. The Court held that a mere breach of promise does not constitute rape under Section 376 IPC if the promise was not false from the inception.

The petitioner, Mahendra Ladu Sawant, was an accused in FIR No.151/2018 lodged on 01/11/2018 under Section 376 IPC (rape) based on a complaint by resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape Case Against Applicant in Consensual Relationship with Promise to Marry — No Offence of Rape Made Out When Physical Relations Were Consensual and Promise to Marry Was Not False from Inception.

The applicant, Devendra s/o Vikas Pawar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship Between Engaged Couple. Court holds that sexual intercourse between engaged parties with promise of marriage does not constitute rape under Section 376 IPC if consent is voluntary and not induced by false promise.

The applicant, Navneet Bangalkar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR No.057...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Public Interest Litigation on Unregulated Stem Cell Therapies for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Court Examines Legality Under Drugs Act and Lays Down Permissibility of Such Therapies in Clinical Trial Settings Only.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Yash Charitable Trust and others before the Supreme Court, raising concerns about the rampant promotion a...