Search Results for "maximum retail price"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Drug Price Fixation Notifications for Frusemide and Theophylline Formulations. Price Fixation Under DPCO 1995 is a Legislative Exercise and Does Not Require Individual Hearing.

The appeals by special leave challenged the decision of the Allahabad High Court which had rejected writ petitions filed by the appellants, M/s T.C. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Legal Metrology Cases for Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors cannot be held liable for company's offences under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 without specific averments of their role in the offence.

The judgment involves multiple criminal petitions filed by directors of companies against whom proceedings were initiated under the Legal Metrology Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Legal Metrology Cases for Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors cannot be prosecuted for company's offences under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 without specific averments of their role in the commission of the offence.

The judgment involves multiple criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by directors and managing directors...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...