Search Results for "limited review"

3925 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3925 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Setting Aside Review Order for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Appellate Court's Review of Its Own Judgment Was Without Jurisdiction as There Was No Error Apparent on the Face of the Record Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The appellants, defendants in a suit for declaration and possession, challenged the judgment of the Senior Civil Judge, Sira, who allowed a review pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Club Licence Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review sought against order requiring club to obtain licence under Section 176 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963; court held that review is not an appeal and no ground for review exists.

The petitioner, D.V.R.Recreation Club (a unit of Janege Green Gardens Private Limited), filed a review petition under Section 114 read with Order 47 R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioners seek re-argument on merits, not correction of error.

The review petition was filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) seeking review of an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Death Sentence Case Under IPC Sections 302 and 449 - Review jurisdiction limited to errors apparent on the record; no rehearing or re-appreciation of evidence permitted under Article 137 of the Constitution and Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

The Supreme Court of India, in a review petition filed under Article 137 of the Constitution, dismissed a challenge to its earlier judgment affirming ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Student Attendance Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII CPC not available to re-agitate merits where examination already concluded.

The applicant, Ankita Jagannath Sonawale, a post-graduate law student at Maharashtra National Law University, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, was disallowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record in Order Granting Time to Pay Deficit Stamp Duty. Review Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Ground Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC for Recall of Judgment.

The Review Petition No.340 of 2019 was filed by Seetharama Shetty (the petitioner/plaintiff) seeking recall of the judgment dated 23.08.2019 passed in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on record, not re-hearing the appeal.

The judgment pertains to a review application filed by the appellants in First Appeal No. 620 of 1996, seeking review of the judgment and order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petitions in Urban Land Ceiling Case — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review petitions under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC seeking review of order dated 17/06/2016 in WP Nos.54609-54610/2014(ULC) dismissed as no error apparent on record.

The review petitions were filed by M/s Vivekananda Foundation (R), claiming to be the allottee of a portion of land in Sy.Nos.81 and 82 of Kasaba Hobl...