Search Results for "licensing order"

414 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 414 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Licensing Requirement for Food Business — Holds That MMC Act and FSS Act Can Coexist Without Repugnancy. Section 394(1)(e) of MMC Act, 1888 is Not Void Under Article 254 as It Operates in a Different Field of Municipal Regulation.

The petitioner, Sanjeev Rajaram Chimbulkar, a food business operator, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Driving License in Motor Vehicle Act Case — Lack of Notice and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. License Suspension Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Provide Show Cause Notice Before Suspension Under Section 19(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Neelappagouda S/o Virupaxgouda Patil, was a driver employed with KSRTC. On 25.08.2014, while driving a bus bearing No.KA-19F/2461 on N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Driving License in Motor Vehicle Act Case — Lack of Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Petitioner's license suspended under Section 19(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 without prior notice or opportunity to show cause.

The petitioner, a driver employed with KSRTC, was involved in a road accident on 25.08.2014 while driving a bus. An FIR was registered under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes State Licensing Order for Petroleum Products Due to Lack of Delegated Authority. State Government Cannot Issue Order Under Essential Commodities Act When Central Government Has Already Occupied the Field.

The Petitioners, an association of licence holders from oil companies for sale of petroleum products, challenged the Maharashtra Petroleum Products De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal arises from a decision of the CESTAT dated 2 January 2013, which held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order passed under Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cardholder's Petition, Quashes Minister's Order Restoring Fair Price Shop Licence in Misappropriation Case. Revisional Power Under Clause 24(2) of Maharashtra Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1975 Cannot Be Exercised Without Proper Justification.

The petitioner, Shivaji Tulshiram Thakre, a resident and cardholder under the public distribution system, filed a complaint against respondent No.4, S...