Search Results for "licensee protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "licensee protection"

398 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 398 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Licence Revocation and Adverse Possession. Court holds that licence granted for construction is revocable under Section 62 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, and that mere long possession does not establish adverse possession without proof of hostile animus.

9 Oct 2025

The present second appeal arises from a property dispute between two brothers, Madhukar Bholaram Hatwalne (original defendant) and Yeshwant Bholaram H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Film Distribution Rights Dispute Over 'Sholay' and 'Sholay-3D'. The court held that a prima facie case for breach of contract and infringement of copyright was made out, warranting protection of the plaintiff's exclusive distribution rights pending trial.

9 Mar 2020

The plaintiff, Narendra Hirawat And Co., filed a commercial IP suit seeking to enforce its exclusive distribution and exploitation rights in the films...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — KYK Mark and Trade Dress Protected. Leave under Clause XIV of Letters Patent granted to combine causes of action for infringement and passing off.

28 Jan 2020

The plaintiffs, Mohtimbas Engineering Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff No.1, an Indian stockist and distributor) and a Taiwanese manufacturer (Plaintiff No.2), fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Loknatya Kala Kendra Licences by Tahsildar for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Acting Under Dictation. The Court Held that a Licensing Authority Must Exercise Independent Discretion and Cannot Cancel a Licence Merely on Directions of Superior Officer Without Applying Its Own Mind.

27 Sep 2012

The two writ petitions arose from the cancellation of licences granted to the petitioners for running Loknatya Kala Kendras (folk art centres) in vill...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Licensor in Eviction Dispute Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — License Held for Residential Purpose. The court restored the eviction order of the Competent Authority, holding that the license was for residential purpose and the Competent Authority had jurisdiction under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Deepak S. Kavadiya, is the owner of Flat No. A/1102, Juhu Griha Swapna CHSL, JVPD, Juhu, Vile Parle West, Mumbai-400056. Respondent No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Licence Fee Validity Under Factories Act, 1948; Levy Is Fee, Not Tax, Due to Services Rendered by Inspectors. Inspection Services and Spending of 60% of Fee Revenue Establish Quid Pro Quo Justifying Annual Renewal Fee for Factories Under Delhi Factories Rules, 1950.

11 Sep 1969

The Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd., which operated several factories in Delhi, was required under the Factories Act, 1948 and the Delhi Factor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Property Owners Against Attachment Under MPID Act — Property Not Proceeds of Crime. The court held that property owned by third parties not accused cannot be attached merely because the accused was in possession under a leave and licence agreement.

15 Dec 2023

The appellants, Smt. Madhu Deepak Gogri and Mayank Deepak Gogri, are the owners of Shop Nos. 1 and 2 in Prem Bhanu Apartment, Borivali (West). The pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

15 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging IPAB's Dismissal of Trade Mark Rectification Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. The Court Examines the Interplay Between Common Law Rights and Registered Trade Marks, Specifically Sections 27(2), 28, 47, and 57, in Context of Deceptive Similarity Between 'ROFOL' and 'PROFOL'.

3 Apr 2012

The dispute between Medical Technologies Limited (petitioner) and Neon Laboratories Limited (respondent no.1) concerned the trade marks 'PROFOL' and '...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)