Search Results for "juvenility"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "juvenility"

40 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Juvenile Claim After Conviction Finality in Murder Case — Benefit of Section 7-A of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 Applicable Even Post-Conviction. The court held that a claim of juvenility under Section 7-A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 can be raised at any stage, even after the conviction has attained finality, and the court must determine the age and grant the benefit of the Act if found to be a juvenile.

26 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Gurumukhsingh Tak, was convicted for murder and was serving his sentence in Central Prison, Amravati. He filed a Criminal Writ Petitio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 2023

The appellant, P. Yuvaprakash, was convicted by the trial court and the Madras High Court for offenses under Section 366A IPC and Section 6 of the POC...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Murder Conviction Case, Upholding Alibi Rejection and Concurrent Findings. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act sustained based on eyewitness evidence and insufficient proof of alibi, with Juvenile Justice Act applied to a minor accused.

31 Jan 2022

The case involved appeals against convictions for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and a firearm offence ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Abduction but Acquits of Rape in Case of Minor Girl. State's Appeals for Enhancement and Conviction under Section 376 IPC Dismissed, Accused's Appeal Partly Allowed.

22 Aug 2019

The case involves three appeals arising from a trial court judgment where the accused, Hemant Ashokkumar Mittal, was charged with offences under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Sections 376 and 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

22 Dec 2018

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment of acquittal dated 24 July...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder Under Section 304(I) IPC — Stone Blow During Quarrel Over Cotton Sale. The court held that the appellant's act of throwing chilly powder and striking the deceased on the head with a stone was done with knowledge that it was likely to cause death, but without intention to cause death, thus falling under Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

22 Dec 2017

The appellant, Suraj Shrikrushna Sonowane, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, for the offence punishable under Section 304(I) of the India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 324 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the appellants shared a common object to commit murder.

20 Sep 2017

The appeal arises from the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli, in Sessions Case No. 27/1994, convicting the appellants for of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Administrative Report on Juvenile Age Determination — Directs Formal Inquiry Under Juvenile Justice Act. The Court held that determination of juvenility must be done through a judicial inquiry under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 read with Rule 12 of the 2007 Rules, not through an administrative report.

21 Sep 2011

The petitioner, Vijay Gokul Mhaske, was a convict lodged at Yerwada Central Prison, Pune. He filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicted Accused in Murder Case — Age Determination Issue Not Proven. Appellant failed to establish juvenility on date of offence despite claiming birth date of 6/7/1983, as evidence from school and birth records was inconsistent.

8 Sep 2006

The appellant, Amit @ Bapu Nanasaheb Bhandwalkar, was convicted in a criminal case and filed Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 2005 before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Juvenile Offender in Murder Case — Life Sentence Set Aside Due to Juvenile Status. Petitioner Declared Juvenile Under Section 2(k) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 on Date of Offence, Entitled to Benefit of Lesser Punishment Under Section 15 of the Act.

2 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Rahul Govind Sharma, was convicted for the murder of Siddheshwar Rai under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenced t...

2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)