High Court of Judicature at Bombay Admits Multiple Writ Petitions and Issues Rule — Petitioners seek legal remedy against respondents in civil dispute.
25 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "joint patta"
87 result(s) found
Found 87 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition for Joint Patta Directing Consideration of Representation After Online Filing. Court Directs Tahsildar to Enquire and Pass Orders Within Eight Weeks on Petitioner's Application for Joint Patta Based on Exchange Deed, Emphasizing Online Filing Requirement.
27 Mar 2025The petitioner, S. Subramanian, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court...
High Court
Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Direction for Patta Mutation Based on Purchase and Explanation Representation. Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation and Pass Final Orders Within Twelve Weeks Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
19 Mar 2025The petitioners, claiming title through purchase, approached the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India see...
High Court
Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Seeking Cancellation of Patta and Mutation of Joint Pattadar; Directs Enquiry by Revenue Divisional Officer Within 12 Weeks. Revenue Authority Directed to Consider Pending Application and Pass Orders on Merits After Hearing All Interested Parties in Accordance with Law.
19 Mar 2025The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madur...
High Court
Madras High Court Quashes Tahsildar’s Mutation Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Mutation of Joint Patta Without Notice to Legal Heirs of Deceased Co-Owner Violates Principles of Natural Justice; Matter Remitted for Fresh Adjudication.
7 Mar 2025The writ petition arose from a challenge to an order dated 30.01.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District, in mutation proc...
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Found Genuine and Binding on Defendants. Court upholds concurrent findings of fact that the sale deed executed by husband of first defendant for family necessity was valid and that plaintiffs had established title and possession.
8 Jan 2025The case involves a property dispute where the original plaintiff Varadappan (since deceased, represented by respondents 2 to 8) filed a suit for decl...
- 50
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Direction to Conclude Revenue Enquiry in Land Title Dispute. Court Directs Tahsildar to Complete Enquiry Within Eight Weeks Based on Earlier Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer.
7 Jan 2025The petitioner, R. Sakthivel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third resp...
- 13
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Survey and Boundary Fixation for Petitioner's Property in Keeranur Village. Court Orders Revenue Authorities to Complete Survey Within Eight Weeks Based on Petitioner's Application.
7 Jan 2025The petitioner, Mageswari, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the respondents (District...
- 33
High Court
Madras High Court Partly Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Siblings — Declares Plaintiff's Title but Restricts Relief to RCC House Only. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the courts below that the plaintiff had proved his title and possession over the suit property, but modified the decree to exclude the thatched house from the relief, considering the plaintiff's admission.
2 Jan 2025The second appeal arises from a property dispute between siblings. The plaintiff, Murugesan, filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction aga...
- 132
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Sandalwood Confiscation Case — High Court Order Restored. Confiscation under Section 61A(2) of Kerala Forest Act, 1961 invalid as no forest offence proved; landowners entitled to benefit of Government Order dated 03.04.1973 for auction of sandalwood on private patta lands.
14 May 2024The case involves appeals by the State of Kerala and its Divisional Forest Officer against a High Court judgment that set aside the confiscation of sa...
- 496
