Search Results for "investigation detention period"

630 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 630 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to establish live-link between alleged activities and public order disturbance.

The petitioner challenged a detention order passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) and its subsequent ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximity Between Offences and Public Order. Detenu's Criminal Activities Found to Affect Law and Order Only, Not Public Order, Rendering Preventive Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Pranali Yogesh Karkhandis, challenged a detention order dated 23rd January 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane City, unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Consideration of Bail Orders. Detaining Authority's Failure to Interact with Witnesses and Consider Bail Orders Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Suraj @ Lalla Kalicharan Thakur, through his father, challenged the legality of a detention order dated 20/10/2022 passed by the Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Inordinate Delay. The court held that the detaining authority failed to apply its mind and the delay of over two years in executing the order vitiated the detention.

The petitioner, Naresh Dua, brother of the detenu Rajesh Dua, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's bail status and passed the order mechanically, violating the requirement of subjective satisfaction.

The petitioner, Shri Madhukar Mahadeo Manve, challenged the detention order dated 19th August 2004 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...