Search Results for "invalid sanction"

567 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 567 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Corruption Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Must Be Granted by Competent Authority Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 23.08.2017 passed by the LXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Misapplication of Section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Charge Framed Under Wrong Provision Invalidates Conviction

The appellant, a Junior Clerk in a Sessions Court, was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MCOCA Sanction Against Petitioner Due to Non-Application of Mind by Sanctioning Authority. Sanction Order Under Section 23(1) of MCOCA Set Aside as Authority Failed to Consider 'Continuing Unlawful Activity' Requirement.

The petitioner, Sagar Balasaheb Gaikwad, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of the sanction order dated 27.11.2018 un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Invalid Pension Case — Qualifying Service of Ten Years Must Be Satisfied Under Orissa Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992. Invalid Pension Under Rule 39 Cannot Be Granted Without Meeting the Minimum Qualifying Service Prescribed Under Rule 47.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Odisha against the judgment of the Orissa High Court, which had upheld the Odisha Administr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-Analysis. Accused Acquitted as Sample Became Unfit for Analysis Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra filed three appeals against the acquittal of the accused Harishchandra Sadhuram Agarwal, a vendor and proprietor of a kirana ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Material and Non-Application of Mind in Granting Approval and Sanction. Appellants Discharged Under Section 227 CrPC as Material on Record Did Not Warrant Framing of Charge Under MCOC Act.

The present appeals were filed by Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal and Umesh Mohan Kirve, who were accused Nos. 3 and 9 respectively in a case registered under...