Search Results for "individual workman"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "individual workman"

228 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 228 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan held to confer jurisdiction on Industrial Court at Mumbai under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

19 Sep 2025

The petition was filed by Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 4 May 2022...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Transfer as Unfair Labour Practice. Transfer of Employee After 28 Years of Service to Chennai Held Malafide and Without Justification Under Items 3 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

3 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Sulzer Pumps India Private Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Thane, which declared that the employer had engag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Hotel Employees Terminated Without Notice or Wages Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer's Challenge Dismissed as Termination Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-conditions of Notice and Compensation.

5 Dec 2018

The judgment arises from two cross writ petitions filed by workmen and their employer, Eastern International Hotel, challenging an order dated 06/06/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Transfer from Navi Mumbai to Mysore. Transfer Order Upheld as Valid Exercise of Employer's Right Under Contract of Service.

12 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Uday Shantikumar Dixit, joined Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (respondent no.1) on 23rd November 1981 as an Assistant Draughtsman and was later ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Cooperative Court Orders in Service Disputes — Upholds Reinstatement and Back Wages for Employees. Cooperative Court and Appellate Tribunal orders reinstating employees with continuity of service and back wages upheld as the bank failed to prove misconduct and violated principles of natural justice.

11 Mar 2016

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Cooperative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd., filed four writ petitions challenging identical judgme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

28 Nov 2011

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Reinstatement and Backwages Due to Limitation Under Section 42(4) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Approach Notice Filed Beyond Stipulated Period Without Sufficient Cause, Hence Labour Court's Order Set Aside.

8 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Pedru Mozes Fernandes, was a permanent workman employed as a boiler serviceman at Tata Mills from 1st March 1973. He worked continuous...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Superannuation at 58 Years — Employee Promoted to Executive Cadre Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act. Promotion to Assistant in Executive cadre removes employee from definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, making complaint under MRTU & PULP Act not maintainable.

19 Jan 2005

The Petitioner, Shri Inthru Noronha, joined Ciba of India Limited (later Hindustan Ciba Geigy Limited) on 1 June 1965 as a typist and later became a P...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)