Search Results for "incompetent FIR"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "incompetent FIR"

34 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in POCSO Case — DNA Evidence Conclusive Despite Hostile Victim. Conviction Under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and POCSO Act Upheld as DNA Report Proved Appellant as Biological Father of Aborted Fetus of Mentally Retarded Minor.

29 Jan 2019

The appellant, Shaktiman Sondawale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and Sections 5...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

10 Oct 2018

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Suspension Orders of Municipal Officers Under Section 56(1)(b) of BPMC Act for Disciplinary Enquiry. The court overruled a previous Division Bench decision that had restricted the provision to criminal proceedings, holding that suspension pending enquiry into charges is valid.

22 Dec 2011

The case involved a writ petition filed by five officers of the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation challenging their suspension orders. The petitioners...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 145 CrPC Proceedings in Multi-Party Disputes and Successive Orders. The court held that Section 145 CrPC applies to disputes involving more than two parties and that successive orders are permissible if fresh material shows a new apprehension of breach of peace.

25 Nov 2010

The case involves a group of writ petitions and intervention applications challenging the validity of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Cri...

2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)