Search Results for "income share"

1559 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1559 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Share Transfer and Gift Validity. Statutory Register Prevails Over Returns Filed with Registrar of Companies in Case of Conflict.

The present appeal is filed under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956, challenging the order and judgment passed by the Company Law Board. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment based on mere change of opinion on share premium addition under Section 68 is invalid as all material was disclosed during original assessment.

The petitioner, Rajshree Realtors Private Limited, a real estate company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-2013 declaring income of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Share Broker Bad Debt Case — Affirms Deduction Under Section 36(1)(vii) of Income Tax Act. Amounts Advanced for Client Transactions Constitute Business Debts Allowable as Bad Debts Even if Only Commission Was Credited to Profit and Loss Account.

The appeal by the Revenue arose from a decision of the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 16 July 2010. The assessee, Shri Shrey...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeals; Profits from Sale of Gold and Shares Held Capital Receipts Not Taxable as Income. Court Rules Transactions Were Realisation of Investment, Not Adventures in Nature of Trade, and High Court Erred in Treating Tribunal's Finding as Unreviewable Fact.

The appeals arose from references under Section 66(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 concerning the assessee, a large landholder, who had inherited subst...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Company Appeal No.19 of 2009 Challenges CLB's Findings on Reduction of Shareholding, Removal of Director, and Valuation of Land Under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The case involved a dispute between shareholders of Pantheon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a company formed to acquire and develop a 13-acre property in M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Investment in Shares of Private Company for Acquiring Control Held as Capital Asset, Not Stock-in-Trade. Shares held for 31 months with transfer restrictions cannot be treated as trading asset under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Accra Investments Private Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25 April 2012 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxation of Alleged Shortfall in Share Premium Under Transfer Pricing Provisions. The Dispute Centers on Whether Chapter X of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Can Apply When No Actual Income Arises from the International Transaction.

The petitioner, Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident holding company, issued 2,89,224 equity shares at a pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioner Company in Reduction of Share Capital Case Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. Court-Ordered Valuation Found Plausible; Minority Objectors Failed to Prove Unfairness.

Cadbury India Limited filed a petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a special resolution for reduction of...