Search Results for "implied surrender"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "implied surrender"

130 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Acquisition Order Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance and Delay. Land Acquisition Proposal Sanctioned in 2006 Set Aside as Authority Failed to Complete Acquisition Within Reasonable Period, Rendering the Order Unenforceable.

31 Aug 2021

The petitioners, H.I.M.S. Botawala Charities (a public charitable trust) and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Restores Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Appellate Court Erred in Reversing Conviction Without Properly Appreciating Evidence and Rebuttal of Presumption.

13 Jun 2023

The case involves two appeals filed by the original complainant, Mrs. Usha Hiralal Kanojia, against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Share Dispute Due to Civil Nature. Dispute over share purchase agreement held to be purely contractual, not constituting criminal breach of trust or cheating under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC.

8 Aug 2019

The petitioners, Rohan Dukle and Sudhir Gudal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

High Court

Forfeiture of Tenancy under Section 111(g) TPA Not Attracted When Tenant Claims Firm Tenancy Without Denying Landlord’s Title – Bombay High Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Second Appeal No. 81 of 2013 (2026)

4 Mar 2026

The plaintiff filed a suit for possession, arrears of rent, and damages claiming that Late Mohd. Siddique was his tenant since 1960. Lat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Eligibility Certificate Under 1988 Industrial Package Scheme. The Court held that the cancellation was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued before cancellation.

21 Aug 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Nav Maharashtra Cement Industries, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

17 Dec 2024

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions on Lapse of Acquisition Under KIAD Act Due to Non-Passing of Award. Petitioners, Subsequent Purchasers, Argue Absence of Statutory Time Limit Does Not Allow Indefinite Delay, While Respondents Contend Delay Caused by Petitioners' Own Litigation and Interim Orders.

7 Mar 2019

The writ petitioners, subsequent purchasers of lands measuring 16 acres 4.25 guntas in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, challenged the acquisition proce...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)