Search Results for "impleadment"

816 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 816 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Impleadment of Property Owner in Writ Petition Challenging Building Rules Due to Direct Impact of Interim Order. Owner's Building Sealed and Demolition Ordered Based on Interpretation of Interim Order Keeping New Rules in Abeyance Under Punjab Unified Building Rules, 2025.

The dispute originated from a writ petition (CWP No. 38742 of 2025) challenging the Punjab Unified Building Rules, 2025. The High Court passed an inte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Purchaser Pendente Lite. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment Proper as Purchaser is Necessary Party to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

The petitioner, Fabrica Da Igreja De Vasco, purchased the suit property from the original defendant No.1 during the pendency of a suit filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment and Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order in Service Charges Dispute. Applicant Company Held to be Necessary Party as Successor-in-Interest of Defendant Firm Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, Tarun Keshrichand Shah and Priyalata Keshrichand Shah, filed a suit (Suit No. 6117 of 2007) against M/s. Kishore Engineering Co. (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Letters of Administration in Succession Dispute — No Grounds for Revocation Under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Concealment of Material Facts Not Established; Court Had Jurisdiction as Deceased's Fixed Place of Abode Was in Mumbai.

The petitioner, Kamal Prasad, filed a petition under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking revocation of Letters of Administration g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Impleadment in Tenant's Suit Challenging Municipal Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act, 1888 — Owner Held Necessary Party as Decision Directly Affects Property Interest.

The petitioner, M/s Mulraj Khatau and Sons Ltd., the owner of a suit property, filed a Chamber Summons under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Partner in Suit by Firm Despite Non-Compliance with Order 30 Rule 4 CPC — No Amendment of Plaint Required for Adding Partner as Co-Plaintiff. Partner of a firm can be added as co-plaintiff without amending plaint as firm is not a separate legal entity.

The appellant, Manohar Kashinath Vyawahare, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing his application for...