Search Results for "impermissible recovery"

704 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 704 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Excess Pay for Over Five Years Without Employee's Fault Held Impermissible Under Article 226 of the Constitution, Applying Rafiq Masih.

The writ petition was filed by a Sheristadar working under the Subordinate Judge, Tirukoilur, challenging an office order for recovery of excess pay a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Quashing Recovery of Excess Pay from Government Employee; Holds Recovery After Long Delay Without Misrepresentation Impermissible Under Rafiq Masih Principles, Confirms Pay Revision and Directs Refund of Amount Recovered.

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by D. Sivakumar, a government employee working as Central Naz...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Appellants for Murder and Kidnapping in Gang-Related Killing. Life imprisonment confirmed for murder under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and kidnapping under Section 364 read with 34 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and witness testimony.

The Appellants, Balvindersingh Balvirsingh Rathod, Diljit Babusingh Labhana, Raina Asaraf Khan, and Bhalchandra Haridas Mahale, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Daily Wagers Against Recovery of Excess Salary. Recovery Order Quashed as Arbitrary Under Article 226 of Constitution of India for Payments Made Under Government Resolution Without Misrepresentation.

The petitioners, nine daily wagers employed with the respondent State of Gujarat, challenged a recovery order dated 04/02/2013 (No.113 of 2013) seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay in Ordnance Factory Case. Recovery of Excess Amount Paid Due to Employer's Mistake Held Impermissible When Employees Are in Same or Higher Pay Scale and No Misrepresentation Is Involved.

The petitioners, employees of Ordnance Factory Bhandara, were granted a higher pay scale by the employer. Subsequently, the employer sought to recover...