Search Results for "immediate employer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "immediate employer"

440 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 440 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan held to confer jurisdiction on Industrial Court at Mumbai under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

19 Sep 2025

The petition was filed by Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 4 May 2022...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ESIC Demand Notices for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Employer's Failure to Produce Records Does Not Justify Ex-Parte Assessment Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing.

19 Sep 2025

The petitioners, a company and its director, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging various demand notices, recovery notices, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging ESI Circular for Construction Workers. Circular extending ESI Scheme to construction site workers held valid under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

14 Mar 2017

The petitioners, Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Association of India (CREDAI) and two real estate firms, challenged a Circular dated 31st Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Goa Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Against Provident Fund Commissioner's Order — Contractors' Employees Held Entitled to Provident Fund Benefits Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Principal Employer Cannot Escape Liability for Provident Fund Contributions of Contractor's Employees Under Section 2(f) of EPF Act.

25 Mar 2015

The appellant, Goa Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., a government corporation registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in promoting touri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Workmen Seeking Absorption in Western Coalfields Limited — Canteen Workers Not Entitled to Direct Absorption as Contractor Was Not a Sham and Contract Labour Was Not Prohibited Under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1947.

5 Jan 2011

The petitioner, a trade union representing workmen of Taroda Opencast Mine of Western Coalfields Limited, challenged an award of the Central Governmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Air India Challenging Rejection of Approval Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act — Withdrawal of Earlier Application and Reinstatement of Workman Bars Fresh Application for Approval of Dismissal Based on Same Misconduct.

30 Aug 2006

The case involves a challenge by Air India Ltd. (the petitioner) against an order of the Presiding Officer of the National Industrial Tribunal at Mumb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Terminated on Loss of Confidence. Unfair Labour Practice Found Under Item 1(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Suresh Narbharam Kachalia, was a workman employed by M/s Shakti Insulated Wires Ltd. since 25 July 1963. After serving for nearly 23 y...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Revision of Wage Structure and Abolition of Concessions in Industrial Dispute. Employer Allowed to Abolish Bounty Concessions as Wage Structure Revision Principles Clarified.

15 Oct 1957

This case arose from an industrial dispute between Messrs. Crown Aluminium Works and its workmen concerning the revision of wage structure and the abo...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)