WRIT PETITION NO. 7034 OF 2024
25 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "higher pension"
564 result(s) found
Found 564 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition by Retired Employees in Pension Scheme Dispute, Upholding State's Authority to Repeal Welfare Measure with Cut-off Date. Denial of Pensionary Benefits Under Himachal Pradesh Corporate Sector Employees Scheme, 1999, After Repeal on 02.12.2004, is Valid as It Does Not Alter Accrued Rights Under Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1995.
16 Apr 2025The dispute involved three retired officers of the Himachal Pradesh State Forest Development Corporation Limited, a state-owned entity, who filed a pe...
- 327
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Pension Benefits Including 50% of Part-Time Service for Teacher. Half of Part-Time Shikshan Sevak and Teacher Service Counted Towards Qualifying Service Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.
9 Oct 2024The petitioner, Babaso Ganpatil Awate, a Scheduled Caste teacher, was appointed as a Part Time Shikshan Sevak on 18 July 2002 in an aided post at Resp...
- 1681
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Claim for Old Pension Scheme in Aided Junior College. Petitioner appointed prior to cut-off date entitled to consideration under Full Bench judgment.
30 Jun 2023The petitioner, Ms. Anjali w/o Anil Tanksale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking the benefit of the Old Pension...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions for Pensionary Benefits to Shikshan Sevaks under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Primary Schools (Conduct of Service) Rules, 2014. Held that service as Shikshan Sevak counts towards qualifying service for pension.
19 Aug 2022The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by Shikshan Sevaks (teachers) employed in Zilla Parishad schools in Maharashtra. The petitioners, Vij...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired Professor in University Departmental Enquiry — Delay and Lack of Sanction Render Proceedings Invalid. Post-retirement disciplinary proceedings initiated after superannuation without prior sanction under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, and with inordinate delay, are unsustainable.
18 Jan 2022The petitioner, Dr. Dipak Vishwnathrao Muley, a retired Professor of Shivaji University, Kolhapur, challenged a chargesheet dated 28 August 2018 issue...
- 60
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unauthorised Absence from Qualifying Service for Pension in DTC VRS Cases. The court held that period of absence without authorisation cannot be counted towards qualifying service for pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, even if employee availed VRS.
26 Feb 2019The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) against the respondents, ex-employees who had availed of the Vol...
- 189
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pension of Part-Time Teacher - Service as Part-Time Teacher Must Be Counted for Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The Court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's entire service for pension benefits.
4 May 2017The petitioner, Sou. Mone Rashmi Shriram, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29/6/2016 issued by the Office...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits by Counting Prior Service with Board Under Rule 46(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Resignation to Take Up Another Appointment with Permission Does Not Forfeit Past Service
10 Dec 2013The Petitioner, Smt. Nagaveni R., filed a writ petition seeking pension and other retiral benefits by counting her service from 25.2.1975 to 5.11.1984...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Withholding of Pension for Misconduct in Municipal Corporation Cases. Pensionary benefits can be withheld under Pension Rules for misconduct committed during service, even after retirement, if proceedings are initiated within a reasonable time.
3 Feb 2005The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by former employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (now Mumbai) challenging the Commiss...
- 115
