Revocation of Probate Not Maintainable on Grounds of Title Dispute. Bombay High Court
17 Mar 2026The Bombay High Court held that a probate cannot be revoked on the ground that the testator lacked title to the bequeathed property. S...
Search Results for "grandchildren share"
57 result(s) found
Found 57 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Settlement Deed by Father Not Invalid as Properties Were Self-Acquired, Not Ancestral. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ancestral Nature of Suit Properties Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
8 Jan 2026The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction claiming that the suit properties were ancestral properties of Arunachala ...
- 153
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Society's Challenge Against Rejection of Deemed Conveyance and Cancellation of Registration in MOFA and MCS Act Dispute. Competent Authority Cannot Reject Deemed Conveyance Application on Ground of Non-Registration of Bye-Laws Under MCS Act; Minister's Order for Cancellation of Registration Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice.
30 Apr 2024The judgment concerns two connected writ petitions filed by New Manoday Co-operative Housing Society Limited challenging two separate orders: (1) an o...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Status Quo and Appointment of Receiver in Property Dispute. Court Holds That Suit for Declaration and Injunction Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata and That Receiver Cannot Be Removed Without Proper Application.
17 Aug 2022The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (Afzal Khan and others) against the appellants (Mehboob Ayub Khan and others) seeking declarati...
- 30
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Title Suit Due to Fraud and Fabrication — Lok Adalat Decree Set Aside as Collusive and Without Proper Verification. Compromise Decree Obtained by Fraud is a Nullity and Can Be Challenged Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
4 Jun 2021The petitioner, Smt. Padmavati, originally filed a writ petition challenging a compromise decree dated 27.09.2010 passed in O.S. No.243 of 2010 on the...
- 145
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Father's Appeal in Child Visitation Rights Dispute - Emphasizes Child Welfare Over Legal Technicalities. The Court Remands Matter to High Court for Fresh Consideration with Expert Assistance to Ascertain Children's Wishes.
14 Feb 2020The case involves a custody and visitation rights dispute between Soumitra Kumar Nahar (appellant-husband) and Parul Nahar (respondent-wife). The coup...
- 157
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Award for Loss of Dependency and Funeral Expenses. Claimants entitled to compensation for death of breadwinner under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
13 Mar 2017The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Dandesh Patil, who died in a road accident in...
- 41
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.
15 Dec 2016The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. The trial court d...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Appointment of Court Receiver and Interim Compensation in Property Dispute. Court holds that mere filing of affidavits does not establish grave urgency warranting appointment of receiver or direction for deposit of interim compensation at an interim stage.
4 Jul 2012The appellant, Ramesh Sippy, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking possession of Flat No.5/B in Shree Vijayaa Bhavan, Mumbai, claiming ownersh...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and suit was filed beyond three years from notice of refusal under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.
30 Nov -0001The appellant, Sandeep Kashinath Parab, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15/06/1998 allegedly executed by the respo...
- 99
