Search Results for "forest officer"

35 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Age Relaxation: Cannot Claim General Category Seat. Age Relaxation Under Gujarat Policy Is a Relaxation in Standard, Not a Mere Concession, and Candidates Availing It Must Be Adjusted Against Reserved Posts.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana against the Gujarat Public Service Commission and others, upholding the D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Irregularly Appointed Forest Officers in Seniority Dispute. Appointments Beyond Advertised Vacancies Held Illegal, Seniority Counts Only From Regularisation Date.

The case pertains to the seniority of Assistant Conservators of Forests (ACFs) in the Bihar Forest Service. The appellants were appointed on 13.04.198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction to Release Seized Vehicles in Forest Offence Cases. Magistrate's Power Under Section 451 CrPC Not Ousted by Initiation of Confiscation Proceedings Under Section 52(3) of Indian Forest Act, 1927.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the State of Madhya Pradesh against High Court orders directing the release of vehicles seized for illegal san...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Forest Officer in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Failure to Prove Incident Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Manner of Occurrence.

The appellant, Sukumaran, a Forest Range Officer, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri, for offences under Sections 302 and 203 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against U.P. Jal Nigam in Workmen Reinstatement Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court Held That the Order Dated 07.09.2015 Only Required Giving Preference to Retrenched Workmen for Future Vacancies, Not Automatic Reinstatement.

The present contempt petitions arose from an order dated 07.09.2015 passed by the Supreme Court disposing of a batch of Special Leave Petitions filed ...