Search Results for "forest offence"

230 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Prosecution's Case Fails: Appellant Acquitted of Bribery Charges. Inconsistencies and Lack of Evidence Lead to Appellant's Acquittal in High-Profile Bribery Case

The prosecution failed to substantiate the charge under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii) of the Act against the appellant (AO1). The evidence did n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Forest Offence Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antecedents. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 62, 86, 87 of Karnataka Forest Act and Rule 154 of Karnataka Forest Rules.

The petitioner, Mr. Vijay Kumar K., filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in F.O.C.N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Electrocution Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge and Common Intention. Conviction under Section 304 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That Appellants Knew the Electric Wire Was Lethal.

The appellants, Vilas Hari Kulmethe and Laxman Kanhu Pendam, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Forest Offence Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Illicit Felling Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Confessional Statements and Seizure Panchanama Found Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 26(i)(d),(f),(g) of Indian Forest Act, 1927.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 31/07/2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Katol in Summary Cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Crop Damage by Tigers in Agricultural Land - State Directed to Pay for Banana Plantation Loss. Forest Department's Recommendation for Compensation at Rs.48 per Plant Upheld; Finance Department's Refusal Based on No Policy Held Arbitrary.

The petitioner, Baburao Abaji Aglawe, a retired government servant, owned agricultural land in Seloo, Wardha, where he cultivated banana plants on 5 a...