Search Results for "forcible sexual intercourse"

338 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 338 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence on Age of Victim. Consent of Victim Above 16 Years Renders Sexual Intercourse Not Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Pande, was convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape of a minor girl, Latiba (PW2), and sentenced to seven years rigorous imprison...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri, in Sessions Case No.58/2006 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage — Consent Not Vitiated as Relationship Was Consensual and Prolonged. Prosecutrix's Testimony Lacks Credibility Due to Inconsistencies and Delay in FIR; Conviction Under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside.

The appellant, Anwar Khan Iqbal Khan, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the offence of rape under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Consent-Based Sexual Relationship Not Rape Under Section 375 IPC as Promise of Marriage Was Not False from Inception.

The appellant, Amit Shende, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5(j)(ii) and (l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(j)(n) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Riyaz @ Riyaz Pasha, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Special Case No.80/2014 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 452, 406, and 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The appellants, Satish Say...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Rape and Cheating in Consensual Relationship Case. Long-term consensual relationship with promise of marriage conditional on employment does not constitute rape under Section 376 IPC as promise was not false from inception.

The applicant, Sidharth Vishwanath Wasnik, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Based on Credible Testimony and Medical Evidence. Testimony of Victim Alone Sufficient for Conviction Under Section 376 IPC When Found Reliable and Corroborated by Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Vincent Fernandes, was convicted by the trial court under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for committing rape on a 14-year-old gir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed Complaint. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mansoor @ Ismail, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru, in S.C.No.136/2011 for ...