Search Results for "eye-witness identification"

316 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony found unreliable and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jony @ Abdul Rahim Abdul Khalik Shaikh, was convicted by the IInd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions Case No.22 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole reliance on chance witness identification without corroboration was unsafe.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three appellants (original accused nos. 1, 2, and 5) against their conviction under Section 302 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Railway Robbery and Assault Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 332, 353, 323, 504, 506-II IPC and Section 153 Railways Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Kumar Ramu Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 625 of 2017 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case Based on Injured Witness Testimony and Recovery of Stolen Articles. Identification of Accused in Test Identification Parade Held Valid Despite Allegations of Prior Exposure.

The case arises from a dacoity and murder that occurred on the night of 27-28 May 1999 in Nallavumpatti village. The deceased, Sengoda Goundar, was sl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as sole reliance on testimony of child witness without corroboration and failure to prove identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Azhar Abdul Pappuwale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli on 16th November 2017 under Sections 302 and 307 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Drug-Laced Banana and Theft Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 328 and 379 IPC set aside as sole witness failed to identify accused in court and prosecution failed to prove administration of intoxicating substance.

The appellant, Rajesh Jatihusain Ansari, was convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 328 (administering...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 452 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sadashiv Basappa Madgyal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for offences under Sections 302, 324 and 452 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and testimony suffered from contradictions and improvements.

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 47 of 1999 for offences pun...