Search Results for "eye-witness credibility"

317 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 317 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The case arises from a common judgment of the Sessions Court convicting multiple accused for offences including murder, attempt to murder, and rioting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as testimony of child witness was inconsistent with medical evidence and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Tukaram Rau Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of Yashodabai, and sentenced to life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Unexplained Injuries. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Machhindra @ Avinash Ganpat Teltumde, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Sudhir under Section 302 IPC and sentenced ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 452 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness failed to identify accused and medical evidence did not support prosecution version.

The appellant, Kailas Sopan Jade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 302, 307 and 452 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Evaluates Appeal Against Conviction for Murder of Wife Under Section 302 IPC Based on Dying Declarations. Court Scrutinizes Credibility of Written and Oral Dying Declarations in Absence of Eyewitnesses, Considering Principle That Dying Declaration Can be Sole Basis of Conviction.

The appeal arose from the conviction of appellant Vinayak Pawar under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his second wife Sunita by setting her on fire ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 120-B IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by four accused persons against their conviction and sentence by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close friend of deceased and his testimony was not corroborated by other evidence.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of three appellants for the murder of Mayur Damle under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and for assaul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 201 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellants, Jafar Khijar Sheikh and Sumit Appa @ Prakash Gawali, were convicted by the District Judge-10 and Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Assault Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Tannu @ Tanvirkhan Rahimkhan, Chotu s/o Singai Uike, Krunal s/o Bapurao Madavi, and Ramesh s/o Roopchand Nandeshwar, were convicted by...