Search Results for "excess depreciation"

75 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 75 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Charitable Trust for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Framji Dinshaw Petit Parsee Sanatorium, is a public charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices for HUF Assessee in Income Tax Case — Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Notices under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as reasons for reopening were based on mere change of opinion and not on fresh tangible material.

The petitioner, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) carrying on cotton ginning and pressing business, challenged four notices dated 30 March 2004 issued un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Income-Tax Officer's Appeal, Affirming That Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Could Not Be Issued as Right to Reopen Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922 Was Barred. Section 297(2)(d)(ii) of 1961 Act Does Not Revive Time-Barred Reassessment Powers.

The case involved an income-tax reassessment dispute arising under the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the Income-tax Act, 1961. The respondent, an assessee,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Claim to Treat Compensation as Capital Receipt Under Income Tax Act. Lump sum payment received by managing agent for reduction in remuneration held to be revenue receipt as it was in lieu of future profits and not for loss of managing agency.

The assessee firm, M/s. Godrej & Company, was appointed managing agent of a limited company for thirty years from November 9, 1933, under an agreement...