Search Results for "examination valuation"

473 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 473 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Mesne Profits Award in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Rate Fixed at Rs.1,24,099 per Month Based on Expert Evidence. Court Confirms That Mesne Profits Are Determined by Market Rent, Not Controlled Rent, and Interest at 6% p.a. Is Appropriate.

The case involves a dispute between Bata India Limited (the applicant/tenant) and Bindiya Co-operative Housing Society Limited (the respondent/landlor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Enhanced for Agricultural Land with Potential. Land situated near village and road held to have non-agricultural potential, warranting higher compensation under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Pramod Sadashiv Khodke, owned agricultural land bearing Gat No.82, area 4.31 hectares, situated at village Kohli, Taluka Babhulgaon, Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case - Market Value Enhanced to Rs.30 per sq.mtr. for Village Percolation Tank Project. Potential Value and Comparable Sale Instance Considered Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves multiple first appeals filed by original claimants whose agricultural lands in village Vaiju Babhulgaon, Taluka Pathardi, District A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claim for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Reference for Municipal Market and Housing. Claimant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation awarded by SLAO under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case is a Land Acquisition Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the claimant, Pundalik Raghunath Mahulkar, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Electricity Bill Dispute — Sets Aside Lower Appellate Court's Judgment for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. First appellate court must independently assess evidence and give reasons for reversal of trial court's findings.

The appellant, Sureshkumar S/o Rochiram Jagyasi, was a customer of the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (respondent) and operat...