Search Results for "evidence insufficiency"

286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Accused Failed to Prove Defence That Cheque Was Issued for Different Transaction and Cash Paid.

The complainant, Stanley Barros Pereira, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the accused, Julieta Cot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Despite Separate Trials for Multiple Cheques. Dishonour of three cheques treated as separate offences under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, but separate trials not resulting in prejudice.

The dispute between the complainant Nilesh P. Salgaonkar and the accused Deelip Apte involved three cheques issued by the accused to the complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs. 1,50,000 for Plot Purchase — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Smt. Y. Bangarama, filed a criminal appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 23rd July 2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant failed to establish existence of debt or liability under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as loan transaction was not proved.

The appellant, Smt. Tasneem Murshedkar Mazhar, was the original complainant in a summary criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to establish that the loan of Rs.3,00,000 was legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Arti Rajesh Karangutkar, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of respondent No.1, Anna Rocky Fernandes, by the Metropolitan Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Conviction Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Accused's Defence of Blank Cheque Misuse and Absence of Loan Disbursement Raises Probable Doubt, Rebutting Presumption Under Section 139.

The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant, ANSS Rajashekar, was accused by the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Corroboration. Benefit of Doubt Given for Murder Charge but Conviction for Cruelty Maintained Under Section 498A IPC.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from the death of a young married woman within nine months of her marriage due to burn injuries. The ...