Search Results for "erroneous fixation"

267 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 267 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Gratuity Order — Transfer with Lien Does Not Break Continuous Service Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employer Liable to Pay Gratuity Based on Higher Pay Scale of Parent Organization.

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the judgment and order dated 25/11/2019 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Order — Employer Held Liable for Full Gratuity Despite Employee's Transfer to Another Corporation. Lien Maintained with Original Employer During Transfer, Making It the 'Employer' Under Section 2(f) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

The Petitioner, Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the judgment and order dated 25/11/2019 passed by the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices — Increments and Leave Benefits for Daily Wagers Upheld Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged a judgment and order dated 17th October 2019 passed by the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Retired Employees Due to Administrative Error. Recovery of excess payment from retired employees without fault on their part is impermissible under principles of equity and natural justice.

The petitioners, retired employees of New Arts, Commerce & Science College, Ahmednagar, filed writ petitions challenging the recovery of excess salary...