Search Results for "employer-employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "employer-employee"

64 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Employee Convicted of Theft While Under Suspension — Limitation Bar Applied for Delayed Challenge. The Court held that a removal order under Rule 19(i) of CCS (CCA) Rules is not a continuing wrong and delay of 13 years cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

27 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Labour Court Award in Favor of Workman in MSRTC Dismissal Case — 25% Back Wages Granted for Procedural Violation. Dismissal Quashed as Enquiry Officer Was Not Appointed by Competent Authority Under Section 6(6) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2019

The petitioner, the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and award dated 4.8.2018 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Employees' Union and Individual Claimant in Company Liquidation Dispute — Upholds Official Liquidator's Decision to Reject Claims as Time-Barred Under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that workmen's dues, though entitled to priority, must be claimed within the limitation period prescribed under Rule 148 of the Company Court Rules, 1959.

8 Aug 2019

The case involves two appeals filed by the Kamani Employees' Union and Mrs. Triveni A. Kulkarni against the Official Liquidator and others. The disput...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councilor for Office of Profit — Secretary of Watershed Committee Not an Office of Profit Under Section 16(1)(h) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court held that the position of Secretary of a Watershed Management Committee with an honorarium of Rs.3,000 per month does not constitute an office of profit under the Act.

31 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Bhagwat Digambarrao Uphad, was elected as a Councilor of the Zilla Parishad. Respondent No.6, Vikram Hanumantrao Uphad, filed an appli...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Provident Fund Office Against Garment Company — Holds Home-Based Women Workers Are Employees Under EPF Act. Piece-Rate Payment and Work From Home Do Not Exclude Workers from Definition of 'Employee' Under Section 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

24 Jul 2019

The present civil appeal arose from a challenge to the Bombay High Court's order dated 27.04.2012, which had set aside the Provident Fund Officer's de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Directions for Regularization of Workers. Industrial Court's findings on completion of 240 days and unfair labour practices upheld, with directions to send proposals for permanency.

17 Jul 2019

The petitioner, the Municipal Council of Kalamb, filed three writ petitions challenging identical judgments dated 22/08/2017 passed by the Industrial ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in Air India Ltd. — Probationers Have No Right to Be Confirmed and Termination Without Stigma Is Valid.

25 Feb 2019

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Jeetendra Krishna Varma (WP 875/2011) and Mayank Mohan Sharma (WP 1427/2015) against Air India Lt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by State Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Cases. Daily Wage Workers' Regularisation Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

20 Jun 2012

The petitioners, the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Pune, and the State of Maharashtra, challenged a common order dated 18 January 1999 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ICAR and NRCC, Upholds State Government as Appropriate Government for Labour Dispute. Jurisdiction of Labour Court under MRTU & PULP Act Confirmed for Termination of Agricultural Labourers Employed by Central Government Undertaking.

23 Nov 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the National Research Centre for Citrus (NRCC) against a judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

26 Aug 2010

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)