Search Results for "electricity theft"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case — Failure to Prove Theft Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused Acquitted Under Section 135(1) of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 as Prosecution Failed to Establish Illegal Connection and Theft of Electricity.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case — Failure to Prove Theft Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal upheld as prosecution failed to establish illegal connection and theft of electricity under Section 135(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.07...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal by Electricity Board in Bill Dispute Case — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Theft of Electricity. Trial Court's Decree Set Aside for Failure to Frame Proper Issues and Consider Evidence on Meter Tampering.

The case involves an appeal by the Executive Engineer, Gujarat Electricity Board (now Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd) and others against a judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Reduces Compensation for Illegal Consumption. ABCD formula assessment for theft of electricity is valid but must be proportionate to actual consumption period.

The appellant, Gujarat Electricity Board now Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd, filed a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Enhanced Demand in Electricity Theft Case — Appellate Authority Cannot Enhance Contract Demand Without Cross-Objection. Maximum demand for electricity charges cannot be increased by appellate authority in absence of cross-objection by the board under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s Ravi Steel Industries, a partnership firm, challenged two appellate orders passed by the Appellate Authority (respondent No.2) und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Direct Theft and Procedural Lapses. Theft of Electricity Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove That the Accused Was Directly Involved in the Theft or That the Meter Was Tampered With.

The appellant, Bhanudas Supadu Wani, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 11 of 2005 for theft of electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Meter Found in Disconnected State and No Proof of Unauthorized Use of Electricity Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Santosh Datta Chitalkar, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 7 of 2005 for theft of electr...