Search Results for "dual prosecution"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in POCSO Case — State Appeal Against Inadequate Sentence Allowed. Court holds that Section 5(1) of POCSO Act mandates minimum sentence of ten years and trial court's imposition of less than ten years is illegal.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the inadequacy of the sentence imp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Ashok Dhondiram Dhavale, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag for the murder of Leelabai and her daughter Manisha under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Two Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shrimant @ Wantya s/o Mokinda Pawar and Dashrath s/o Shrimant Pawar, were convicted by the trial court for the murder of one person un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Investigation into MLA's Assets for Lack of Credible Material. Court holds that mere allegations of disproportionate assets without prima facie evidence cannot justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Sanjay Dinanath Tiwari, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking investigation into the financial affairs o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Conviction under Section 21 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper authorization and without informing accused of right to be searched before gazetted officer or magistrate.

The appellant, Suleman Oguk @ Soni, was convicted under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder by Burning in Brothers-in-Law Dispute. Dying declaration and medical evidence found credible to prove guilt under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The appellants, Duryodhan Mahadeo Tantarpale and Gangadhar Vishwanath Tantarpale, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Trial No....