Search Results for "document marking"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "document marking"

299 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision and Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Cases — Conviction Restored for One Cheque, Acquittal Set Aside for Another. The court upheld the conviction of the accused in one case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and set aside the acquittal in another case, holding that the presumption under Section 139 was not rebutted in the first case, while in the second case the debt was time-barred and not legally enforceable.

22 Mar 2025

The judgment involves two connected matters: Criminal Revision Petition No.400/2016 and Criminal Revision Petition No.401/2016 filed by Sri D. Vijay (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

18 Dec 2020

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Recall of Plaintiff in Will Dispute — Failure to Consider Evidence and Non-Compliance with Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. Court holds that recalling a witness for further examination is not permissible after the plaintiff's evidence is closed and the suit is posted for judgment, as it would cause prejudice to the other side.

21 Oct 2020

The petitioner, Smt. Gangamma, filed a suit for declaration and injunction based on a registered Will executed by her father Thimmanna. The suit was f...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — Agreement of Sale Not Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance. Court holds that an agreement of sale simpliciter without possession is not chargeable as a conveyance under Article 5(e) of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and impounding under Section 33 is not warranted.

5 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Mr. R. Mahendra Kumar Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25.11.2015...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — Agreement of Sale Not Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance. Court held that an agreement of sale does not require stamp duty as a conveyance under Article 5(e) of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and impounding with penalty was improper.

5 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Mr. R. Mahendra Kumar Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25.11.2015...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Prove Execution. Court finds that the Will and Codicil were not proved in accordance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, due to lack of attesting witnesses and suspicious circumstances surrounding the documents.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two connected matters: a Miscellaneous Petition (No. 39 of 2004) and a Testamentary Suit (No. 4 of 2005), both relating to the e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Dispel Doubts. Court holds that propounders must prove due execution and testamentary capacity beyond suspicion, and failure to examine attesting witnesses or explain unnatural bequests leads to rejection of probate.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two testamentary proceedings: a Miscellaneous Petition No. 39 of 2004 in Testamentary Petition No. 233 of 2004 and a Testamentar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence in Partition Suit. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to re-examine witnesses on matters already covered, and that the trial court's discretion in refusing to reopen evidence was not perverse or arbitrary.

19 Nov 2015

The petitioners, who are plaintiffs in a partition suit (O.S. No. 100/2007) pending before the Principal Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District, filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Supply Dispute — Upholds Award on Unpaid Invoices but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Arbitrator's findings on oral contracts and quantum of supplies upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The petitioner, Royal Palms (India) Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Recall of Commissioner Appointment in Commercial Suit — Coordinate Bench Cannot Recall Orders of Another Coordinate Bench Unless Per Incuriam. Order Appointing Commissioner Without Reasons Is Not Per Incuriam Under Order XVIII Rule 4 CPC.

13 Aug 2012

The reference before the Division Bench arose from an order dated 4 July 2012 of a learned Single Judge (B.R. Gavai J.) in Suit No.550 of 2003. The su...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)