Search Results for "dishonored cheques"

84 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 84 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 138 NI Act Complaint Against Directors Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Complaint against directors quashed as complaint lacked specific allegations of their role in company's conduct.

The applicants, K & K Foundry Pvt. Ltd. and its two directors, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deeds. Consent order in previous suit does not create estoppel against defendants in subsequent suit for different reliefs.

The respondents-plaintiffs filed Special Civil Suit No. 102/2020 seeking cancellation of registered sale deeds, perpetual injunction, and alternativel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Sets Aside Conviction Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice. The court held that without proper service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the conviction cannot be sustained.

The case involves a dispute under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, Vinodkumar Rathi, alleged that the accused, M/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction and Limitation Bar. Complaint Filed Beyond Limitation After Return for Want of Jurisdiction Cannot Be Entertained Without Fresh Cognizance.

The applicants, original accused Nos. 2 to 4, challenged the order dated 18.06.2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gangapur, issuing p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted Only by Preponderance of Probabilities, Not Mere Denial.

The appellant, Sau. Dwaribai Nanakram Jivatramani, proprietor of Rajesh Agarbatti, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal...