Search Results for "dishonest inducement"

128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank Officials and BGR Energy Executives in Bank Guarantee Dispute -- No Criminal Intent Found in Commercial Transaction Under IPC Sections 420, 403, 406, 418, 425, 427 read with 34

The High Court quashed an FIR registered against bank officials and company executives alleging criminal offences in connection with bank guarantee tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 420 and 471 IPC Following Settlement of Loan Account Approved by Debts Recovery Tribunal — Criminal proceedings cannot continue after compromise of civil debt where no element of cheating from inception exists.

The case involves an appeal by Vijay Kumar Kela and his proprietary firm against an order of the Chhattisgarh High Court refusing to quash criminal pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cheating and Prize Chit Offences in Bhisi Scheme Case. Oral evidence of members sufficient to prove conventional chit and dishonest intention under Section 420 IPC and Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978.

The case involves two criminal revision applications filed by the applicants/accused, Subhadrabai Pawar and others, challenging their conviction under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet in Money Lending Dispute Due to Civil Nature of Transaction. Sections 384, 420, 506 IPC Not Attracted as Dispute Pertains to Loan Repayment and Not Criminal Extortion or Cheating.

The petitioner, Sathish Kumar S, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager in Embezzlement Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Misappropriation of Funds

The appellant, N. Raghavender, was the Branch Manager of Sri Rama Grameena Bank, Nizamabad Branch from May 1990 to September 1995. He was convicted by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dishonest Inducement. Section 420 IPC requires deception from inception; mere failure to pay after cheque dishonour does not constitute cheating.

The petitioner, Sanjaykumar Kasliwal, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 420/511 IPC Charges in Money Lending Case Due to Absence of Deception. Default in Loan Repayment Does Not Constitute Cheating Under IPC When Initial Intention to Repay Existed.

The petitioner, Ramesh Babulal Chaudhari, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashing of FIR No. 3...