Search Results for "discovery panchnama"

303 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Arms Act and IPC in 1993 Bombay Serial Blasts Case. Appellants Challenged Conviction for Possession of Prohibited Arms Without License and Destruction of Evidence.

The Supreme Court heard appeals against the conviction and sentence of Sanjay Dutt (A-117), Yusuf Mohsin Nulwalla (A-118), and Kersi Bapuji Adajania (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for strangulation of wife set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nilesh Laxmikant Vyas, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, for the murder of his wife, Neha @ Pooja, under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Mahadeo Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, for the murder of his brother-in-law, Ravikiran, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery, Acquits Accused of Rape Due to Lack of Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder and Section 392 IPC for robbery, but acquitted under Section 376 IPC as prosecution failed to prove rape.

The case pertains to the murder of a woman and robbery of her gold ornaments. The deceased was last seen with accused No.1 (Ajijkhan Pathan). Subseque...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Weak Evidence. Bail was allowed as appellants were in custody for over four years without charges framed, and evidence under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and UAPA provisions was insufficient to deny bail.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by two accused persons, identified as accused nos. 46 and 47, who were charged with offences under the Unlawful...