Search Results for "disappearance"

447 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 447 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive, Last Seen Evidence, and Recovery of Articles.

The appellant, Pramil @ Premanand Rao, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder and r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Accused's Failure to Explain Disappearance of Deceased Leads to Guilt Under Sections 302, 364, 201 IPC.

The appellant, Bhimrao Bankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his brother-in-law, Atul, under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Land Dispute Case. Circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen, extra-judicial confession, and recovery of incriminating articles held sufficient to convict under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Tauba Gonde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 188/2013 for the murder of a v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence, Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, in Sessions Case No. 27 of 2005. Criminal Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Deceased Identified Through Tattoo Marks; Last Seen Theory and Motive Established.

The appellant, Uddhav @ Madhukar Ramchandra Jadhav, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for the murder of Gaman Dashrath Paw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Motive Not Proved and Last Seen Theory Not Established.

The appellant, Suresh Sominath Pawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for the murder of Anil under Sections 302 and 201 IPC....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Mayur Mulji Parmar and Bharat Mulji Parmar, were convicted by the Sessions Court, Mumbai, for the murder of an unknown woman and for c...