Search Results for "departmental enquiry after retirement"

307 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Tribunal's Reinstatement Order - Upholds University's Compulsory Retirement of Junior Engineer for Serious Misconduct Under Maharashtra Universities Standard Code Rules

The High Court of Bombay allowed a writ petition filed by Petitioners challenging the University and College Tribunal's order that had set aside the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Interest on Delayed Retiral Benefits to Exonerated Employee — Rule 55A(7) of Pension Rules, 1953 Deems Payment Due from Retirement Date, Not Exoneration Date, and Interest Is Payable Without Proving Administrative Lapse.

The petitioner, Narayan Pundalik Pathade, a retired employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Articl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in CRPF Compulsory Retirement Case — Punishment Valid Under Rules. Compulsory Retirement Held to Be a Species of Removal Permissible Under Section 11 of CRPF Act Read with Rule 27 of CRPF Rules.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and CRPF authorities against the judgment of the Orissa High Court, which had set aside the punishme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second Departmental Enquiry Against RPF ASI for Same Misconduct — Double Jeopardy Principle Under Article 20(2) of Constitution and Rule 219.4(b) of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Bars Re-prosecution After Final Punishment

The petitioner, Ramrao Maroti Shinde, an Assistant Sub-Inspector in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was subjected to a departmental enquiry in May...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension and Departmental Inquiry Against Municipal Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction. Suspension Order Passed by Municipal Commissioner Instead of General Body Held Invalid Under Section 57 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Mr. Sanjay G. Gharat, an employee of the Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC), challenged the suspension order dated 18th Jun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Full Retirement Benefits to Retired Employee. Retirement Benefits Constitute Property Under Article 300A of Constitution of India, Cannot Be Withheld Without Legal Authority.

The petitioner, Shri Babulal Fakira Vasaikar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and other respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Voluntary Retirement Due to Pending Disciplinary Proceedings and CBI Investigation. Rule 56(k) of CCS Rules Does Not Confer Unilateral Right to Retire When Serious Allegations Are Under Investigation.

The petitioner, Dr. Sanjay Sharma, joined Tata Memorial Hospital as Assistant Surgeon on 29th November 1985 and was later appointed Professor of Surge...