Search Results for "delay penalty"

1477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — Agreement of Sale Not Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance. Court held that an agreement of sale does not require stamp duty as a conveyance under Article 5(e) of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and impounding with penalty was improper.

The petitioner, Mr. R. Mahendra Kumar Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25.11.2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Disciplinary Matter. Delay of 8 Years in Filing Original Application Not Sufficiently Explained, No Sufficient Cause Shown.

The petitioner, Anil Ramdas Pawar, a retired BSNL employee, was working as an Assistant General Manager in the Telecom Department, Amravati. He was no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Full Predeposit of Penalty in FEMA Case — No Undue Hardship or Prima Facie Case Established. Appellant failed to demonstrate financial hardship or strong case on merits for waiver of predeposit under Section 19(1) of FEMA, 1999.

The Appellant, Rajkumar Shivhare, was proceeded against for violation of Section 3(c) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) for allegedl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Provident Fund Damages for Delayed Remittance. Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Imposes Strict Liability Without Requiring Mens Rea.

The petitioner, M/s HMT Limited, a Central Public Sector Enterprise, challenged the order dated 2.1.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reduction of Penalty in Disciplinary Proceeding for Pay Fixation Misconduct — Proportionality of Punishment Upheld. Court held that while misconduct was established, removal was disproportionate and Appellate Authority's modification to reduction to lowest scale was justified.

The petitioner, Rajesh Ashok Mankar, was employed as a Computer Operator with Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (KRCL). He was initially appointed on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Assistant PF Commissioner Due to Delay and Laches in Challenging EPF Damages Order. Petition filed nearly three years after impugned order without explanation for delay, and no merit found in challenge to damages calculation under Para 32A of EPF Scheme, 1952.

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (petitioner) filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...