Search Results for "defence representative"

502 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 502 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Land Grabbing Case Due to Application of Res Judicata. Prior Civil Court Decree Conclusively Determined Title and Possession, Barring Re-litigation Under Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.

The dispute originated from an application filed by the legal heirs of S.V. Srinivasulu Naidu under Section 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Admission of Winding-Up Petitions Under Companies Act, 1956 — Held That Company Court Has Discretion to Appoint Provisional Liquidator and That Appeal Against Admission Order Is Not Maintainable Under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of appeals filed by Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Company Court admitting winding-up petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs and Grants Leave to Continue Proceedings in Specific Performance Suit. Transfer of Property During Pendency of Lis Pendens Does Not Affect Rights of Parties Under Order 22 Rule 4 and Rule 10 CPC.

The Plaintiff, Nirav Deepak Modi, filed Suit No. 1166 of 2006 for specific performance of an agreement for sale concerning a suit property. The suit w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cricket Association Against Injunction Restraining Expulsion of Member. Expulsion Decision Violated Natural Justice as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given Before Imposing Five-Year Ban.

The case involves an appeal by the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) against an order dated 7 September 2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Greater Mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Be Represented by Trade Union Office Bearer in Domestic Inquiry — Vice-President of Union Held Entitled to Represent Member Under Section 22(2)(c) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Statutory Right Cannot Be Restricted by Union Constitution.

The petitioner, Dastgir Alam Mulla, a plant-operator employed by Mysore Petrochemicals Limited since 1992, was suspended on 29-11-2004 and a chargeshe...