Search Results for "deceptive similarity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "deceptive similarity"

123 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.

6 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trade Mark Infringement Case — 'Online Bidi' vs 'Ontime Bidi' — Temporary Injunction Granted. Phonetic and visual similarity between marks 'Online' and 'Ontime' established, and registration of trade mark under Trade Marks Act, 1999 gives prima facie right to injunction.

29 Aug 2022

The appellants, M/s. Mobile Bidi Traders, a partnership firm, are bidi manufacturers and proprietors of the trade mark 'Online' registered under the T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'SUPER MOR CHHAP' Held Deceptively Similar to 'MOR CHHAP'. Registration and Prior Use of 'MOR CHHAP' for Lime Plaster Entitled Plaintiff to Protection Under Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958.

30 Sep 2016

The plaintiff, Sunil Manikchand Kasliwal, filed a suit for trade mark infringement against the defendant, Rahul Uttam Suryavanshi, alleging that the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Case — Defendant's Plastic Container Found Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Design Under Designs Act, 2000. The court applied the 'eye test' and held that the overall impression of the Defendant's product was identical to the Plaintiff's registered design, despite minor differences in colour.

1 Jul 2016

The Plaintiffs, Selvel Industries and Sears Industries, filed a suit for infringement and passing off under the Designs Act, 2000, against the Defenda...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Alleging Deceptive Similarity in Beer Trade Marks. Plaintiff Claims 'Hercules Black Label' Infringes 'Kalyani Black Label'.

1 Apr 2013

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard an appeal filed by United Breweries Ltd (plaintiff) against the judgment and decree of the XXV Addition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against 'ULTRA TUFF' Cement for Infringing 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Trademark and Passing Off. The court held that the mark 'ULTRA TUFF' is deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'ULTRATECH CEMENT The Engineer's Choice' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and restrained the defendants from using the mark.

28 Jun 2011

The plaintiff, Ultra Tech Cement Limited, filed a suit alleging that the defendants, Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd. and another, were infringing its regis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Quia Timet Action for Passing Off Based on Distinctive Bottle Shape of Vodka. Shape of a bottle can be protected as a trademark or get-up if it has acquired distinctiveness and is likely to cause confusion.

2 May 2011

The plaintiff, Gorbatschow Wodka KG, a German company manufacturing Vodka, filed a quia timet action against John Distilleries Limited alleging that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Patent and Trademark Infringement Case — Finds No Prima Facie Case for Injunction. Court holds that patent for method and apparatus does not extend to product, and trademark registration is subject to opposition, thus no interim injunction warranted.

29 Mar 2010

The appeal arises from an order dated 19.11.2009 in Notice of Motion No.3709 of 2009 in Suit No.2576 of 2009, whereby the trial court granted an inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant for Using Deceptively Similar Trademark 'RABITAL' in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'REVITAL' held to be a well-known coined word, and defendant's mark 'RABITAL' found phonetically and structurally similar, likely to cause confusion.

27 Oct 2005

The plaintiff, Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, a pharmaceutical company, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendant, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement Case Over Hair Colour Product Trade Dress. L'Oreal's artistic work in label/trade dress held entitled to protection against alleged imitation by Henkel.

16 Aug 2005

The plaintiffs, L'Oreal India Pvt. Ltd. and its parent company, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, Henkel Marketing I...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)