Search Results for "customs tariff act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "customs tariff act"

232 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MP Power Management Company, Upholds Termination of Power Purchase Agreement for Non-Compliance of Conditions Subsequent. The Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with a non-statutory contract and that the termination was justified as the seller failed to fulfill conditions within the extended period.

1 Jan 2022

The appellant, M.P. Power Management Company Limited, a wholly owned government company responsible for bulk purchase of electricity in Madhya Pradesh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Commissioner of Customs' Appeal Against Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Anti-Dumping Duty Demand. Tribunal Correctly Found Show Cause Notices Lacked Basis for Reclassification and Anti-Dumping Notification Did Not Cover Goods Under Declared Tariff Heading CTH 40021100 Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

21 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Pune against a judgment of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Seeking Reassessment of Customs Duty Due to Typographical Error in Customs Tariff Heading. Petitioner's Inadvertent Error in Declaring CTH 85176990 Instead of 85176930 for Routers Entitles Correction Under Customs Act, 1962.

18 Jan 2021

The petitioner, Dimension Data India Private Ltd., an importer, filed five Bills of Entry between 15.03.2019 and 25.04.2019 for importing 48 units of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Customs Appeal on Valuation of Imported Goods Under Customs Act, 1962 — Design and Supervision Charges Not Addable to Transaction Value. The Court held that costs for post-importation activities like erection, commissioning, and performance guarantee tests are not includible in the assessable value of imported goods under Rule 4 read with Rule 9(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

27 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata, and Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) regarding the valuation ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

18 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal, Holding That Appeal Against CESTAT Order on Exemption Notification Conditions Lies Before High Court Under Section 130 Customs Act. The dispute over unutilized duty-free imported materials after cessation of manufacturing does not involve determination of rate of duty or value of goods for assessment, thus High Court has jurisdiction.

1 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore-1 (appellant) and M/s Motorola India Ltd. (respondent) regarding the proper...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Carrying Cost in Change in Law Claims Under PPA — Restitutionary Principle Upheld. Article 13.2 of Power Purchase Agreement Entitles Generating Company to Carrying Cost from Date of Change in Law Till Approval.

25 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (Haryana Discoms) and Gujarat Urja Vika...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

30 Jan 2015

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Regulations Requiring Additional Examination for Customs House Agents Licenses. No Vested Right to License Arises from Passing Examination Under Repealed Regulations.

7 Dec 2011

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Bombay Custom House Agents Association and two individual members challenging the constit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commissioner's Appeal in Sales Tax Classification Dispute — Entry C74 'Plastic Footwear' Construed as Requiring Predominant Plastic Content, Not Exclusively Plastic. The product 'Escort 111 SYN Black', though not wholly made of plastic, was held to be covered by Entry C74 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as it was predominantly made of plastic and moulded.

24 Jun 2011

The Commissioner of Sales Tax appealed against the decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which had held that the product 'Escort 111 SYN Blac...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)